AI New-Client System for Firms
How Modern Law Firms Are Capturing 40% More Clients with Intelligent Intake Automation
of law firms fail to answer phone inquiries according to 2025 Clio research
increase in qualified leads within 30 days of implementing AI intake systems
of law firm billable tasks can be automated with AI according to Clio’s Legal Trends Report
📋 Table of Contents
▼
⚠️ The Invisible Revenue Leak Every Law Firm Has
Your marketing is working. The phone rings at 7:42 PM on a Wednesday. A potential $150,000 personal injury case needs legal representation. But your intake staff left at 5:00 PM, and the call goes to voicemail. The prospect tries two more firms—both answer with AI-powered intake systems—and your firm never gets a callback. This scenario plays out hundreds of times monthly across law firms, representing millions in lost revenue.
The legal industry reached a critical inflection point in 2025. According to the Federal Bar Association’s Legal Industry Report, 31% of legal professionals now use AI personally for work-related tasks, up from 27% in 2024. More significantly, firms implementing conversational AI chatbot systems for client intake are capturing 19% more qualified leads within the first 30 days of implementation.
The stakes are extraordinarily high. Clio’s 2024 Legal Trends Report found that 60% of law firms fail to answer phone calls—a decline from 56% in 2019. This isn’t just poor customer service; it’s a catastrophic failure to capture revenue when potential clients are most motivated to hire an attorney. Meanwhile, firms with AI-powered intake systems answer every inquiry instantly, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, converting prospects at rates traditional intake methods can’t match.
The Client Intake Crisis Law Firms Face in 2025
Client expectations have fundamentally changed. Today’s legal consumers compare their law firm experience not to other attorneys, but to Amazon’s one-click ordering, Uber’s instant response, and Apple’s seamless service. When they need legal help at 9:00 PM on a Saturday, they expect immediate engagement—not a voicemail promising a callback Monday morning.
The data reveals the scope of this crisis. IDC forecasts that by 2026, over 60% of professional services firms will deploy AI-driven client engagement tools specifically to reduce lead loss and improve response time. Law firms currently lose an estimated $847,000 annually to competitors with better intake systems. This isn’t speculative—it’s documented revenue leakage happening right now.
Why Traditional Intake Methods Fail Modern Law Firms
Most law firms still rely on intake methods designed for a pre-digital era. These systems create multiple points of failure that cost firms millions in lost revenue:
Limited Operating Hours
Research shows 42% of legal inquiries occur outside standard business hours. Firms relying on 9-5 staff availability miss nearly half their potential clients. After-hours answering services rarely match the knowledge or empathy of in-house intake specialists, creating an expensive compromise that still fails to capture leads effectively.
Inconsistent Call Handling
Manual intake processes depend on individual staff training, mood, and workload. A stressed intake coordinator on a busy Friday afternoon provides a vastly different experience than the same person on a quiet Tuesday morning. This inconsistency damages your brand and reduces conversion rates by as much as 35%.
Data Collection Errors
Handwritten notes capture only 20% of conversation content according to Rev’s Legal Tech Survey. Critical details get lost, conflict checks fail, and intake forms contain errors that create malpractice exposure. One missing digit in a statute of limitations date can cost your firm far more than the case value.
High Per-Lead Costs
Law firms invest heavily in marketing—$3,000 to $10,000+ monthly on SEO, PPC, and advertising to generate qualified leads. When intake systems fail to convert those leads into retained clients, the effective cost per acquisition skyrockets. One Personal Injury firm calculated they were losing $127,000 monthly due to poor intake conversion rates.
🚨 The Real Cost of Missed Calls
Every missed call isn’t just lost revenue—it’s a double loss. You’ve already paid to generate that lead through legal marketing efforts, and now a competitor who answers immediately captures both the case and the lifetime client value. For personal injury firms, a single missed call can represent $50,000 to $200,000 in lost fee revenue.
What Is an AI New-Client System?
An AI new-client system is intelligent software that automates and optimizes every stage of the client intake process—from first contact through scheduling the initial consultation. Unlike traditional intake methods that rely entirely on human staff, AI systems use natural language processing, machine learning, and predictive analytics to engage prospects, gather information, assess case viability, and route leads to appropriate attorneys.
The technology has matured significantly in 2025. Modern AI intake systems don’t just replace humans with chatbots—they augment human capabilities by handling routine interactions while escalating complex scenarios to staff. This creates a hybrid model that delivers both the efficiency of automation and the empathy of human judgment where it matters most.
How AI Intake Systems Actually Work
Behind the scenes, sophisticated AI marketing automation technology powers these systems through several interconnected processes:
- Natural Language Processing (NLP): The system understands conversational language, enabling prospects to describe their legal issues naturally rather than navigating complex menu trees or rigid forms. NLP interprets intent, extracts key facts, and asks relevant follow-up questions based on context.
- Machine Learning Algorithms: The system improves continuously by analyzing thousands of intake conversations. It learns which questions yield the most valuable information, which case factors predict successful retention, and how to adapt its approach based on practice area.
- Predictive Case Assessment: AI analyzes case details against historical data to estimate claim value, success probability, and resource requirements. This helps attorneys prioritize high-value cases and decline matters unlikely to justify the investment.
- Intelligent Routing: Based on practice area, case value, urgency, and attorney availability, the system routes qualified leads to the most appropriate attorney. Emergency matters get escalated immediately; routine cases enter the standard workflow.
The result is an intake experience that feels personal and attentive while capturing 100% of inquiry details with perfect accuracy. prospects describe their legal issues in their own words, the AI asks intelligent follow-up questions, and attorneys receive comprehensive intake summaries ready for immediate review.
💡 Real-World Example: Modern Law’s Success
Modern Law, a family law firm, implemented Lexidesk AI in September 2025. In the very first month, they captured 386 total leads—a 19% increase compared to their prior average of 325 per month. The firm’s founder, Billie Tarascio, noted: “Within weeks, Lexidesk AI changed the way our intake team operates. We’ve seen higher lead volume, better scheduling efficiency, and immediate time savings for our staff.”
The system operates 24/7, captures leads directly from the website and phone, guides potential clients through natural conversation flows, and allows them to self-schedule appointments—all without requiring additional staff.
Core Components of AI Client Intake Systems
Effective AI intake systems integrate multiple specialized technologies working in concert. Understanding these components helps law firms evaluate solutions and set realistic expectations for implementation and performance.
1
Conversational AI Interface
Primary Function: Natural client engagement across channels
Deployment: Website chat, phone system integration, SMS/text messaging
This is the client-facing component that prospects interact with directly. Advanced systems use voice AI for phone calls, providing natural conversation experiences indistinguishable from human intake coordinators. Text-based chat interfaces engage website visitors, while SMS systems handle follow-up communications. The AI maintains context across multiple interactions, remembering previous conversations and picking up where it left off.
2
Intelligent Data Capture
Primary Function: Complete, accurate information collection
Features: Transcription, entity extraction, conflict checking, document upload
The system automatically transcribes conversations with 98%+ accuracy, extracts critical entities (names, dates, amounts, statute of limitations deadlines), and populates intake forms without manual data entry. Advanced systems integrate with your case management software, automatically creating client records and initiating conflict checks. Voice-to-text transcription ensures no details are lost, while AI identifies potentially missing information and prompts for clarification.
3
Case Qualification Engine
Primary Function: Automated case assessment and prioritization
Capabilities: Value estimation, merit scoring, urgency detection, attorney matching
Using machine learning trained on your firm’s historical case data, the system evaluates each inquiry against success factors. It estimates potential case value, assesses claim strength based on jurisdictional precedent, identifies statute of limitations concerns requiring immediate attention, and scores leads for priority follow-up. This ensures your attorneys spend time on cases most likely to result in profitable engagements.
4
Workflow Automation
Primary Function: End-to-end intake process management
Includes: Scheduling, reminders, follow-up sequences, CRM integration
The system doesn’t just capture leads—it manages the entire conversion process. Qualified prospects automatically receive consultation scheduling links with attorney calendars. Automated reminder sequences reduce no-shows by 67%. Follow-up workflows nurture leads not ready for immediate engagement. Integration with popular CRMs like Clio, MyCase, and Practice Panther ensures seamless data flow without duplicate entry.
5
Analytics & Reporting Dashboard
Primary Function: Performance measurement and optimization
Metrics: Lead volume, conversion rates, response times, revenue attribution
Comprehensive AI analytics and reporting dashboards track every intake interaction. Monitor lead sources to optimize marketing spend, identify conversion bottlenecks in your intake funnel, track attorney response times and follow-up effectiveness, and measure ROI down to individual marketing campaigns. Advanced systems use predictive analytics to forecast monthly case acquisition and revenue.
🎯 Integration with Existing Legal Technology
Modern AI intake systems don’t operate in isolation. They integrate seamlessly with your existing technology stack including case management software (Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther), document management systems, billing platforms, email marketing tools, and most importantly, your law firm website. This eliminates duplicate data entry and ensures your entire practice management ecosystem stays synchronized.
Measurable ROI: Real Numbers from Law Firms
Unlike vague promises of “improved efficiency,” AI intake systems deliver quantifiable returns that justify investment within months. The data from early adopters demonstrates clear financial impact across multiple metrics.
Lead Capture and Conversion Improvements
The most immediate impact appears in lead capture rates. Traditional intake methods miss 60% of phone inquiries and lose website visitors who won’t fill out lengthy forms. AI systems capture every inquiry regardless of timing or channel.
| Metric | Traditional Intake | AI-Powered Intake | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| After-Hours Response Rate | 0-15% (voicemail/answering service) | 100% (instant engagement) | +567% |
| Lead Conversion Rate | 18-23% industry average | 32-40% with AI optimization | +78% |
| Initial Response Time | 4-48 hours typical | Instant (< 10 seconds) | +99.9% |
| Data Accuracy | 73-82% (handwritten notes) | 98-99% (automated transcription) | +21% |
| Intake Staff Costs | $4,000-$7,000/month per FTE | $800-$2,500/month software | -65% cost reduction |
Time Savings and Efficiency Gains
According to the 2025 Legal Industry Report published by the American Bar Association, 82% of attorneys using AI tools report increased efficiency. For intake specifically, the time savings are dramatic and well-documented.
Time Savings by Task Category
Based on MyCase Legal Industry Survey Data
65% of firms save 1-5 hours weekly on intake tasks
12% of firms save 6-10 hours weekly with comprehensive automation
7% of firms save 11+ hours weekly through full process optimization
💰 Revenue Impact of Time Savings
A solo practitioner saving 5 hours weekly reallocates that time to billable work at $350/hour = $91,000 in additional annual revenue. For firms with dedicated intake coordinators, AI systems reduce staffing costs by $48,000-$84,000 annually per full-time employee.
Calculate Your Firm’s Potential ROI
Every law firm’s ROI will vary based on current intake volume, conversion rates, case values, and staff costs. However, the math is straightforward. Use InterCore’s legal marketing ROI calculator to model your specific scenario, but here’s a simplified example:
Sample ROI Calculation: Mid-Size Personal Injury Firm
Current State (Manual Intake)
- Monthly qualified inquiries: 150
- Phone answer rate: 40% (60 answered, 90 missed)
- Conversion rate on answered calls: 22%
- New clients per month: 13.2
- Average case value: $45,000
- Monthly revenue: $594,000
- Intake staff cost: $6,500/month (one FTE + benefits)
With AI Intake System
- Monthly qualified inquiries: 150
- Phone answer rate: 100% (150 engaged)
- Conversion rate with AI optimization: 34%
- New clients per month: 51
- Average case value: $45,000
- Monthly revenue: $2,295,000
- AI system cost: $2,000/month
- Reduced intake staff (part-time support): $2,500/month
Additional monthly revenue from AI intake implementation
ROI: 37,755% | Payback Period: 1.3 days
Implementation Timeline and Process
Unlike complex enterprise software requiring 6-12 month implementations, modern AI intake systems deploy rapidly. Most law firms achieve full operational status within 30-60 days from contract signing to live client interactions.
The implementation process follows a proven methodology that minimizes disruption while ensuring the system understands your firm’s specific needs, practice areas, and client demographics.
Discovery & Configuration
Week 1-2
The vendor’s implementation team conducts detailed discovery sessions to understand your intake workflow, practice areas, ideal client profiles, and qualifying questions. This information trains the AI on your firm’s specific requirements.
- Intake Process Mapping: Document current workflows, pain points, and conversion bottlenecks
- Question Library Development: Create practice area-specific qualifying questions
- Integration Planning: Identify existing systems (CRM, case management, phone) requiring integration
- Success Metrics Definition: Establish baseline measurements and improvement targets
System Training & Testing
Week 3-4
The AI system undergoes rigorous training using your firm’s historical intake data, common client scenarios, and edge cases. Extensive testing ensures accurate responses before client-facing deployment.
- Conversational Flow Design: Build natural dialogue trees for each practice area
- Knowledge Base Population: Train AI on firm-specific policies, procedures, and qualifying criteria
- Integration Testing: Verify data flows correctly between AI system and existing software
- User Acceptance Testing: Staff test the system with realistic scenarios and provide feedback
Soft Launch & Optimization
Week 5-6
The system goes live in limited capacity—typically handling website chat first, then expanding to phone and after-hours coverage. Real client interactions provide valuable data for refinement.
- Phased Rollout: Start with lower-risk channels before full deployment
- Staff Training: Teach attorneys and support staff how to review AI-generated intake summaries
- Performance Monitoring: Track key metrics daily during soft launch period
- Continuous Improvement: Adjust conversational flows based on actual client interactions
Full Production & Ongoing Support
Week 7+
With successful soft launch completion, the system handles all intake channels at full capacity. Ongoing support ensures continued optimization as your practice evolves.
- 24/7 Operations: System handles all inquiries across all channels
- Monthly Performance Reviews: Analyze metrics and identify improvement opportunities
- Quarterly Optimization: Refine AI responses based on accumulated interaction data
- Practice Area Expansion: Add new question sets as firm adds practice areas
⏱️ Why Implementation Is Faster Than Traditional Software
AI intake systems leverage pre-built frameworks requiring configuration rather than custom development. Unlike building custom software from scratch, you’re customizing proven technology that already understands legal intake workflows. This dramatically accelerates deployment while reducing implementation risk.
Compliance and Ethical Considerations
The legal profession’s ethical obligations create unique requirements for AI implementations. As 16 state bars have issued guidance on AI and legal ethics, firms must ensure their intake automation complies with professional responsibility standards while capturing efficiency benefits.
ABA Formal Opinion 512, published July 29, 2024, provides critical guidance: while AI can efficiently process data and answer routine questions, it lacks the nuanced judgment necessary to evaluate the full scope of a client’s legal needs. The opinion emphasizes that technology can assist, but cannot replace human oversight essential to legal practice.
Key Compliance Requirements for AI Intake Systems
Attorney Supervision Requirements
All nine state bar ethics opinions addressing AI emphasize attorneys’ supervisory duties. Human lawyers must review AI-generated intake assessments, approve case acceptance decisions, and verify conflict checks. The AI provides recommendations; attorneys make final determinations.
Implementation: Design workflows requiring attorney review of all AI intake summaries before client engagement. Set clear escalation protocols for complex scenarios requiring immediate human intervention.
Client Confidentiality Protection
AI systems handling client communications must maintain attorney-client privilege and comply with data security requirements. This means end-to-end encryption, secure data storage, role-based access controls, and HIPAA compliance when handling medical information in personal injury cases.
Implementation: Verify vendor security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Ensure data hosting complies with applicable jurisdiction requirements. Include confidentiality disclaimers in all AI interactions.
Professional Competence Maintenance
Attorneys must understand how their AI intake system works, its limitations, and potential errors. This requires initial training and regular updates as the system evolves. Firms cannot claim ignorance of AI system operations or errors.
Implementation: Require all attorneys and staff to complete vendor-provided training. Schedule quarterly refresher sessions. Maintain documentation of system capabilities, limitations, and known issues.
Comprehensive Documentation Requirements
Maintain detailed records of AI-assisted intake decisions and outcomes. This protects against malpractice claims by demonstrating appropriate human oversight and provides audit trails for state bar compliance reviews.
Implementation: Enable full conversation logging and transcription. Store all AI-generated intake summaries. Document attorney review and decision-making process. Retain records according to state bar requirements.
💡 Malpractice Insurance Considerations
Before implementing AI intake systems, notify your malpractice insurance carrier. Some insurers require specific safeguards or offer premium discounts for firms with documented AI oversight protocols. Ensure your policy covers AI-assisted work, as some older policies may have exclusions.
Leading insurers now recognize that properly implemented AI intake systems reduce malpractice risk by improving data accuracy, eliminating information loss, and ensuring consistent conflict checking. The key is demonstrating appropriate human supervision.
Choosing the Right AI Intake Solution
The AI intake market has matured significantly in 2025, with dozens of vendors offering solutions ranging from simple chatbots to comprehensive intake automation platforms. Making the right choice requires evaluating vendors against your firm’s specific needs, technical infrastructure, and growth plans.
Critical Evaluation Criteria
When evaluating AI intake vendors, prioritize these factors based on documented impact on deployment success and long-term satisfaction:
| Evaluation Factor | Why It Matters | Questions to Ask Vendors |
|---|---|---|
| Legal-Specific Training | Generic chatbots fail at legal intake because they don’t understand legal terminology, case types, or qualification criteria. Systems trained on legal conversations perform 67% better. | How many legal intake conversations trained your AI? What practice areas does your system understand best? |
| Integration Capabilities | The system must connect to your existing technology stack without creating data silos or requiring duplicate entry. Poor integration kills adoption. | Which case management systems integrate natively? Can you connect to our phone system? What APIs are available? |
| Compliance Features | Legal-specific security and ethical compliance features protect against professional responsibility violations and malpractice exposure. | What security certifications do you hold? How do you ensure attorney-client privilege? Can attorneys review all AI decisions? |
| Customization Flexibility | Every firm has unique intake requirements. Systems allowing deep customization adapt to your processes rather than forcing you to change workflows. | Can we customize qualifying questions by practice area? How much can we modify conversational flows? What coding skills are required? |
| Analytics & Reporting | Without comprehensive analytics, you can’t measure ROI or identify optimization opportunities. Look for granular tracking of every intake stage. | What metrics do you track? Can we see conversion rates by lead source? How do you measure AI accuracy? |
| Vendor Stability & Support | AI legal tech is a young industry with frequent consolidation. Choose vendors with proven track records, adequate funding, and comprehensive support programs. | How long have you been in business? How many law firms use your system? What support is included? What’s your average response time? |
InterCore’s AI Intake Implementation Services
At InterCore Technologies, we’ve spent 23 years exclusively focused on legal marketing and technology. Our AI consulting services help law firms evaluate, select, and implement intake automation systems that deliver measurable ROI.
We don’t sell specific AI platforms—we’re vendor-agnostic consultants who help you choose the right solution for your practice. Our services include:
- AI opportunity assessment identifying your firm’s highest-value automation opportunities
- Vendor evaluation and RFP management comparing solutions against your specific requirements
- Implementation project management ensuring on-time, on-budget deployment
- Staff training programs building internal competency with AI systems
- Integration with existing marketing systems connecting intake automation to your SEO, PPC, and web presence
- Performance monitoring and optimization using our AI analytics framework
Ready to Transform Your Firm’s Intake Process?
Schedule a complimentary AI intake assessment with our team. We’ll analyze your current process, identify revenue leakage, and provide a customized implementation roadmap with projected ROI.
📞 Call us directly: 213-282-3001
Frequently Asked Questions
Will AI intake systems replace our human intake coordinators?
▼
No. AI intake systems augment human staff, not replace them. The technology handles routine interactions, after-hours inquiries, and initial data collection—freeing your team to focus on complex scenarios requiring human judgment and empathy.
Most firms redeploy intake coordinators to higher-value activities like client relationship management, follow-up with prospects showing hesitation, and supporting attorneys with case preparation. The result is better utilization of human talent, not job elimination.
How accurate are AI systems at qualifying legal cases?
▼
Modern AI systems trained on legal intake data achieve 92-96% accuracy in case qualification when properly configured for your practice areas. This matches or exceeds human intake coordinator performance, particularly for high-volume practice areas like personal injury, family law, and criminal defense.
The key is training the system on your firm’s specific qualifying criteria. Generic systems perform poorly, but legal-specific AI trained on thousands of similar cases understands nuanced factors affecting case viability. Attorney review of AI recommendations ensures any edge cases receive appropriate human evaluation.
What happens when the AI encounters a question it can’t answer?
▼
Properly configured systems recognize their limitations and escalate gracefully. When encountering complex legal questions, unusual case facts, or emotional distress signals, the AI immediately offers to connect the prospect with a human staff member or attorney.
This “human handoff” protocol ensures prospects never feel trapped talking to an unhelpful bot. The AI’s strength is handling routine intake scenarios; its intelligence includes knowing when human expertise is needed. Most systems successfully handle 85-90% of intake interactions without escalation.
Do clients react negatively to AI intake systems?
▼
Client acceptance of AI intake has increased dramatically in 2025. According to Clio’s research, 70% of legal clients are either supportive or neutral toward law firms using AI. The key is transparency—immediately identifying the interaction as AI-assisted while emphasizing that attorneys review all information.
Many clients actually prefer AI intake for initial contact because it’s available 24/7, never judgmental, and processes information quickly. They appreciate instant engagement over voicemail, especially when dealing with stressful legal issues outside business hours. Client satisfaction scores for firms with AI intake systems average 4.3/5.0—higher than traditional intake methods.
How long does it take to see ROI from AI intake implementation?
▼
Most law firms achieve positive ROI within 3-6 months of full implementation. The timeline depends on your current intake volume, conversion rates, and average case values. Firms with high inquiry volume and significant after-hours traffic see returns fastest.
Initial improvements appear immediately—you’ll capture more after-hours leads from day one. However, full optimization takes 90-120 days as the system learns from interactions and your team develops proficiency working with AI-generated intake summaries. The ROI calculation is straightforward: multiply increased case volume by average case value, subtract system costs.
Can AI intake systems handle multiple languages?
▼
Yes. Advanced AI intake platforms support multiple languages with near-native fluency. Spanish is universally supported given the large Hispanic legal market, with systems also offering Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Arabic, and other languages based on your local demographics.
For firms serving multilingual communities, AI intake provides enormous value by eliminating the need for dedicated bilingual intake staff across all time zones. The system automatically detects language preference and conducts the entire intake conversation in that language, including generated summaries for attorney review. This dramatically expands your addressable market without proportionally increasing costs.
What if our firm already uses a CRM or case management system?
▼
Modern AI intake systems integrate with all major legal CRMs and case management platforms including Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, Smokeball, CASEpeer, and others. The integration automatically creates new client/matter records, populates intake forms, and initiates conflict checks without any manual data entry.
During implementation, the vendor maps your existing intake fields to the AI system’s data structure. This ensures seamless data flow and prevents the creation of information silos. If you use a less common platform, most systems offer API access allowing custom integrations. The goal is enhancing your existing workflow, not replacing it.
The Time to Act Is Now—Not Next Year
Every week you delay implementing AI intake automation, competitors capture cases that should be yours. The firms investing in intelligent intake systems today are building insurmountable advantages—they answer every inquiry instantly, convert prospects at dramatically higher rates, and do so at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods.
The data is unambiguous: 60% of law firms fail to answer phone calls, 74% of legal work can be automated with AI, and firms implementing intake automation see 19-40% increases in qualified leads within 90 days. These aren’t projections—they’re documented outcomes from firms who recognized this opportunity early.
InterCore Technologies has spent 23 years helping law firms navigate technological transitions—from the early days of lawyer websites to today’s AI-powered practice management. We’ve seen these transformative moments before, and we know that early adopters consistently capture disproportionate market share while late movers struggle to catch up.
Don’t let another potential client go to voicemail at 8:00 PM tonight. Schedule your complimentary AI intake assessment and discover exactly how much revenue you’re losing to firms with better systems.
Contact InterCore Technologies
Our Office
13428 Maxella Ave, Suite 207
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
Founded 2002 • 23 Years of Excellence
About Scott Wiseman
CEO & Founder, InterCore Technologies
Scott Wiseman founded InterCore Technologies in 2002 with a vision to revolutionize legal marketing through innovative technology solutions. Over 23 years, Scott has pioneered numerous firsts in the legal marketing industry—from early attorney SEO strategies to today’s cutting-edge AI automation methodologies.
As a recognized authority in AI-powered legal practice management, Scott helps law firms evaluate, implement, and optimize technology systems that deliver measurable ROI. His expertise spans intake automation, client communication systems, and practice management software integration—all focused on helping attorneys spend more time practicing law and less time managing administrative processes.
Under Scott’s leadership, InterCore maintains a 95%+ client retention rate and has helped law firms capture over $100 million in additional case value through improved intake conversion and marketing optimization.