What is the difference between RAG and Agentic RAG?

Traditional RAG uses a fixed, single-pass retrieval approach: query the vector database, retrieve documents, and generate a response. Agentic RAG embeds autonomous AI agents that dynamically decide when to retrieve, which sources to query, whether to refine the search, and how to synthesize multiple results. The agent can take non-linear steps, use multiple tools, and self-correct based on intermediate results—transforming retrieval from a static pipeline into an intelligent, adaptive process.

Which framework should I use for agentic RAG—LangChain or LlamaIndex?

If your focus is search and retrieval with document-heavy workflows, LlamaIndex wins with its advanced indexing and 300+ data connectors. If you need flexible AI pipelines with extensive tool integrations and complex orchestration, LangChain (with LangGraph for multi-agent systems) is better. For enterprise RAG systems, many teams combine both—using LlamaIndex for high-quality retrieval and LangChain for workflow orchestration.

What are the four agentic design patterns?

The four foundational patterns are: (1) Reflection—agents evaluate and iteratively refine their outputs; (2) Tool Use—agents interact with external tools, APIs, and databases beyond their training data; (3) Planning—agents break down complex tasks into structured, multi-step workflows; and (4) Multi-Agent Collaboration—specialized agents work together, each contributing expertise to complete complex tasks.

How does agentic RAG help with AI platform optimization for law firms?

AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity use RAG systems to retrieve and cite sources when answering user queries. Law firms optimized for these platforms—through proper GEO services, structured data markup, and citation-worthy content—become the sources these systems retrieve. Understanding how agentic RAG works helps firms create content that AI systems can easily find, validate, and cite.

What is Self-RAG and how does it improve response quality?

Self-RAG trains models to decide when to retrieve information and to critique their own outputs. Rather than always retrieving or never questioning responses, Self-RAG systems evaluate whether external information is needed, retrieve it if so, then assess whether the generated response faithfully uses that information. This self-reflection and refinement loop significantly boosts factuality and citation accuracy.

What challenges should enterprises expect when implementing agentic RAG?

Key challenges include: high computational costs for training and deploying RAG models; complexity of integrating with legacy IT infrastructure; data privacy and security concerns in regulated industries; lack of standardized frameworks for evaluating RAG performance; and the unpredictability of agentic workflows compared to deterministic pipelines. Start with well-defined, low-risk use cases before expanding to complex multi-agent systems.

How do vector databases fit into agentic RAG architectures?

Vector databases like Qdrant, Pinecone, and Milvus serve as the foundation for semantic search in both traditional and agentic RAG. In agentic systems, the agent uses vector search as one of many available tools. Instead of a fixed query-retrieve-generate pipeline, agents dynamically choose when to query the vector store, can reformulate queries based on initial results, and combine vector search with other tools to construct comprehensive answers.

FAQS - Intercore Technologies

Agentic RAG: Everything AI Engineers Need to Know in 2026

Iintercore

📑 (Click to expand) What Is Agentic RAG? Why Simple RAG Systems Fall Short The Four Agentic Design Patterns Implementation Frameworks Compared Enterprise Adoption and Market Trends Frequently Asked Questions Getting Started with Agentic RAG Simple naïve RAG systems are rarely used in real-world applications anymore. As AI engineers scale their retrieval-augmented generation solutions, they quickly discover that static, single-query architectures cannot handle the complexity of enterprise demands. The solution? Adding agency to the RAG system—ideally, a minimal and controlled amount that transforms retrieval from a one-shot process into an intelligent, adaptive workflow. There is no single blueprint for extending RAG systems to solve your specific business use case. You will need to adapt. For this, you need to understand the potential moving pieces in Agentic RAG and how they work together. This comprehensive FAQ guide covers everything AI engineers need to know about Generative Engine Optimization and agentic retrieval architectures—from foundational design patterns to production-ready frameworks. 💡 Key Insight According to research from Grand View Research, the … Learn More

Is Facebook advertising effective for lawyers

Iintercore

Facebook advertising delivers an average 300% ROI for law firms, with personal injury attorneys seeing costs per case as low as $50-200 compared to $500+ on Google Ads. At InterCore Technologies, we’ve helped Marina Del Rey law firms generate over 10,000 qualified leads through strategic Facebook campaigns since 2002. With 2.9 billion active users and sophisticated targeting capabilities, Facebook offers law firms unprecedented access to potential clients. This comprehensive guide reveals exactly how effective Facebook advertising is for lawyers in 2025, backed by real data from our legal marketing campaigns. Is Facebook Advertising Worth It for Law Firms? Yes, Facebook advertising is highly effective for lawyers when properly executed. Recent data shows that 78% of law firms using Facebook ads report positive ROI within the first 90 days. The platform’s effectiveness stems from three key advantages that traditional legal marketing channels can’t match. ✅ Facebook Advertising Success Metrics for Law Firms 📈 Average conversion rate: 9.21% (vs 3.75% Google Ads) 💰 Cost per lead: $23-47 (vs $86-134 PPC) 🎯 Case acquisition cost: $50-200 (vs $500+ traditional) 📱 Mobile … Learn More

How to choose the right technical SEO agency?

Iintercore

Choosing the right technical SEO agency can mean the difference between dominating search results and watching competitors steal your cases. With 93% of online experiences beginning with search engines and 75% of users never scrolling past the first page, technical SEO isn’t just important—it’s critical for law firm survival in 2025. As the CEO of InterCore Technologies, I’ve helped prestigious firms like The Cochran Firm achieve 418% organic traffic growth through advanced technical SEO strategies. This guide shares our 23-year expertise to help you make an informed decision when selecting your technical SEO partner. Quick Stats: Technical SEO Impact on Law Firms Page speed improvements can increase conversions by 27% Mobile optimization affects 89% of potential client searches Core Web Vitals are ranking factors for 100% of searches Schema markup increases click-through rates by 30% Why Technical SEO Matters for Law Firms in 2025 Technical SEO forms the foundation of your digital marketing success. While content marketing and link building grab headlines, technical optimization determines whether search engines can even find, understand, and rank your content. For … Learn More

How to market a personal injury law firm?

Iintercore

The $40 Billion Question: Personal injury law firms collectively spend over $40 billion annually on marketing, yet 73% report disappointing ROI. The difference? Strategic, data-driven approaches that leverage AI, local optimization, and conversion-focused systems. Marketing a personal injury law firm in 2025 requires mastering the intersection of traditional legal marketing excellence and cutting-edge AI technologies. With Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) revolutionizing how potential clients find legal representation through ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Perplexity, firms that fail to adapt risk losing 40% of their potential case volume. Since 2002, InterCore Technologies has pioneered legal marketing innovations, from developing The Cochran Firm’s digital presence to implementing AI-powered systems that generate 300% increases in qualified leads. This comprehensive guide distills two decades of experience into actionable strategies specifically designed for personal injury practices. 💰 What Should PI Firms Budget for Marketing? Industry Benchmark Alert Top-performing PI firms allocate 7-12% of gross revenue to marketing, with an average spend of $3,200 per … Learn More

FAQS

Agentic RAG: Everything AI Engineers Need to Know in 2026

Is Facebook advertising effective for lawyers

How to choose the right technical SEO agency?

How to market a personal injury law firm?

El Segundo Headquarters

Marina Del Rey Office